Key Differences
In short — Sedatech outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 28% cheaper than Sedatech - €2179.0 vs €3019.9
- Up to 22% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Sedatech - €11.78 vs €15.02 per FPS
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 201 vs 185 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
53rd Variation
FPS
185
92.03980099502488%
Value, €/FPS
€11.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 690 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.02/FPS
78.42876165113182%
Price, €
€3019.9
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,019.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
53rd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
53rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
87.74509803921568%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
84.43627450980392%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
53rd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
99.77477477477478%
Multi-Core
21000
99.8003992015968%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Sedatech PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
