Key Differences
In short — Sedatech outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than Sedatech - €2479.0 vs €3019.9
- Up to 17% better value when playing Dead Space than Sedatech - €17.71 vs €21.27 per FPS
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 142 vs 140 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
44th Variation
FPS
140
98.59154929577466%
Value, €/FPS
€17.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2479
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 634 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€21.27/FPS
83.26281147155619%
Price, €
€3019.9
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,019.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
44th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
4.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2918
93.88674388674389%
Multi-Core
19633
93.30386845356905%
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Sedatech PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
