Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 363 vs 350 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 5% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1429.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing World of Tanks than EMCA4 - €4.08 vs €4.13 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6023 minutes ago
Buy for €1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
30th Variation
38th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
30th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
95%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | CPU | Core i7-11700F |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
