Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 72% cheaper than EMCA4 - €879.0 vs €3099.0
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 344% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 80 vs 18 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Starfield than EMCA4 - €38.74 vs €48.83 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74446 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€38.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3099
28%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €3,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19.233370913190527%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15.426356589147286%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
74.62302317028319%
Multi-Core
8539
56.28130767202742%
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
