Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Gaming - €879.0 vs €1499.0
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 79% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 109 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dead Space than EMCA4 - €13.75 vs €14.41 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
61
55.96330275229357%
Value, €/FPS
€14.41/FPS
95.41984732824427%
Price, €
€879
100%
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77883 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
42nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
36.562366052293186%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
34.122085048010966%
42nd Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
71.8484419263456%
Multi-Core
8539
51.00041808516992%
42nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
