Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper DILC, Neptune I, on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 52% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than DILC, Neptune I, - 70 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 22% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than DILC, Neptune I, - €12.56 vs €16.07 per FPS
Advantages of DILC, Neptune I, PC
- Up to 16% cheaper than EMCA4 - €739.0 vs €879.0
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
FPS
70
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€879
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74328 minutes ago
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
46.721446179129%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
41.24129930394431%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
100%
Multi-Core
7692
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | DILC, Neptune I, PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
