Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield 1 than - 171 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than - €979.0 vs €1529.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than - €5.73 vs €11.41 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
134
78.3625730994152%
Value, €/FPS
€11.41/FPS
50.21910604732691%
Price, €
€1529
64%
Buy for €1,529 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3942 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€979
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3941 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
96.1136890951276%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73.44598672299337%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-9900KF
null-core
Single-Core
1691
79.72654408297973%
Multi-Core
8053
82.77315243087676%
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-9900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |