Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 1155% better in Alan Wake 2 than - 138 vs 11 FPS
- Up to 71% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than - €26.08 vs €90.82 per FPS
Advantages of Computer PC
- Up to 72% cheaper than EMCA4 - €999.0 vs €3599.0
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€26.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3599
27%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2111 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
11
7.971014492753622%
Value, €/FPS
€90.82/FPS
28.716141818982603%
Price, €
€999
100%
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
null-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i9-9900KF
null-core
Single-Core
1691
57.556160653505785%
Multi-Core
8053
41.740527652516455%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Core i9-9900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
