Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 16X outperforms Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing GIGABYTE AORUS 16X is 58 days newer than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72.
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 - 116 vs 99 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Feb 28th, 2024
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 28th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 28th, 2024
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
90%
Multi-Core
14291
87%
GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
