Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms the cheaper ASUS Notebook on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Notebook is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Notebook
- Up to 61% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - €779.00 vs €1999.00
- Up to 19% better value when playing Battlefield V than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - €9.74 vs €11.97 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 109% better in Battlefield V than ASUS Notebook - 167 vs 80 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €779 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.97/FPS
81%
Price, €
€1999
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 5 7535HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
