Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms the more expensive Alienware m16 R2 Notebook on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 30 days newer than the more expensive Alienware m16 R2 Notebook.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Up to 11% cheaper than Alienware m16 R2 Notebook - €2199.0 vs €2459.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Alienware m16 R2 Notebook - €6.47 vs €7.23 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
340
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2199
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
May 1st, 2024
Apr 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
Apr 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
Apr 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | Alienware m16 R2 Notebook |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
