Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms the cheaper Acer Notebook on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Notebook is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Notebook
- Up to 39% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - €1490.0 vs €2427.3
- Up to 31% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - €25.69 vs €37.34 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Acer Notebook - 65 vs 58 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7395 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€37.34/FPS
68%
Price, €
€2427.3
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,427.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
97%
Multi-Core
11484
88%
Acer Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
