Key Differences
In short — Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Notebook is 1869 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of Notebook
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 112 vs 107 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 515 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
107
96%
Value, €/FPS
€17.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 515 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mar 20th, 2019 • 4th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 20th, 2019 • 4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 20th, 2019 • 4th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
