The Radeon RX 6700M is a much slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 135 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 60% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 10 GB
Radeon RX 6700M vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6700M
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
104
81%
Min 1% FPS
58
77%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
€320.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€321.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€319.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€362.63
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€653.79
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700M vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6700M vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6700M vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6700M
May 31st, 2021
Memory
10 GB
62%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
153.6 GPixel/s
50%
Texture Fillrate
345.6 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
11.06 TFLOPS
56%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6700M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
135 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 10 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 160-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 153.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 345.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 11.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
