Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 2322 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Tanks than Radeon R9 Nano - 187 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 130 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
56%
Radeon R9 Nano | vs | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$649 | MSRP | $249 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |