Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 1030 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 629 days older than GeForce GT 1030.
Advantages of Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 1700% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 1030 - 18 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of GeForce GT 1030
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 30 vs 175 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
FPS
1
6%
Value, €/FPS
€97.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
14%
Radeon R9 Nano | vs | GeForce GT 1030 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | May 17th, 2017 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$649 | MSRP | $79 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR5 |
4096-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1228 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1468 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |