The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 175 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 175% more VRAM memory – 11 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
54%
Min 1% FPS
37
46%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Sep 20th, 2018
Average FPS
134
100%
Min 1% FPS
80
100%
Price, €
€1562.8
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.66/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
36%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
83%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
61%
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Sep 20th, 2018
Memory
11 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
616 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
136 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
420.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.45 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2018 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 11 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 352-bit |
| 512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 616 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 136 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 420.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.45 TFLOPS |
