The Radeon R9 390 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc B570. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Arc B570 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc B570
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 150 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 25% more VRAM memory – 10 vs 8 GB
Radeon R9 390 vs Arc B570
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
70
56%
Min 1% FPS
33
46%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
125
100%
Min 1% FPS
72
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390 vs Arc B570 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Ultra
1920x1080
+2
Average FPS
Average FPS
Maximum
1920x1080
+2
Average FPS
Average FPS
Very High
1920x1080
Average FPS
Average FPS
Epic
1920x1080
+4
Average FPS
Average FPS
High
1920x1080
+1
Average FPS
Average FPS
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Arc B570 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Arc B570 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
80%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
44%
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
10 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
380 GB/s
99%
Pixel Fillrate
200 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
360 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.52 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc B570 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2025 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $219.00 |
Pirate Islands (R9 300) | Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 10 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 160-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 380 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 200 GPixel/s |
160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 360 GTexel/s |
5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.52 TFLOPS |