Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
ASUS Phoenix NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition Scheda Video Gaming, GDDR6 4GB, PCIe 3.0, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI-D, Cuscinetti a Doppia Sfera Ventola, Auto-Extreme, Nero

Buy for 257 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 245 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
ASUS Phoenix NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition Scheda Video Gaming, GDDR6 4GB, PCIe 3.0, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI-D, Cuscinetti a Doppia Sfera Ventola, Auto-Extreme, Nero

Buy for 257 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 245 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R9 280X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R9 280X.

Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Radeon R9 280X - 115 vs 103 FPS
  • Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 75 vs 250 Watts
  • Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 4 vs 3 GB
Calculator background
This is a free version of Battlefield V.
Battlefield V

Battlefield V

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280X Logo
Radeon R9 280X

Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013


FPS

103

90%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

115

100%

Value, €/FPS

€2.23/FPS

100%

Price, €

€257

100%

FPS and Value Winner

ASUS Phoenix NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition Scheda Video Gaming, GDDR6 4GB, PCIe 3.0, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI-D, Cuscinetti a Doppia Sfera Ventola, Auto-Extreme, Nero

Buy for 257 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 245 minutes ago

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280X Logo
Radeon R9 280X

Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 280X Logo
Radeon R9 280X

Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013


Pixel Fillrate

32 GPixel/s

60%

Texel Fillrate

128 GTexel/s

100%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

73%

AMD Radeon R9 280X Logo

Radeon R9 280X

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

GeForce GTX 1650

Oct 8th, 2013
Apr 23rd, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGeForce 16
$299
$149
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
Desktop
Desktop
3 GB
4 GB
GDDR5GDDR5
384-bit128-bit
288 GB/s
128.1 GB/s
850 MHz
1485 MHz
1000 MHz
1665 MHz
1500 MHz
2001 MHz

PCs Using Radeon R9 280X or GeForce GTX 1650

With selected game settings

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.