Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R9 280X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R9 280X.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Radeon R9 280X - 115 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 75 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 4 vs 3 GB
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€257
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €257 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
73%
Radeon R9 280X | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$299 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
850 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |