The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 7900 GRE. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 150 vs 260 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 7900 GRE
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
29%
Min 1% FPS
22
20%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Jul 27th, 2023
Average FPS
174
100%
Min 1% FPS
108
100%
Price, €
€623
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.58/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€623.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€724.13
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€678.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
5%
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Jul 27th, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
359.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
718.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
45.98 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi III |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 260 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 359.2 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 718.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 45.98 TFLOPS |
