The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6800. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 150 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
35%
Min 1% FPS
22
26%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
143
100%
Min 1% FPS
86
100%
Price, €
€583.82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.08/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
15%
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 16.17 TFLOPS |
