Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 2% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €212.00 vs €216.99
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 118 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €1.84 vs €2.06 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €212 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
42%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |