Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.

Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100

  • Up to 2% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €212.00 vs €216.99
  • Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts

Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 118 vs 103 FPS
  • Up to 11% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €1.84 vs €2.06 per FPS
  • Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Calculator background
This is a free version of Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo
Radeon Pro WX 2100

Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017


FPS

103

87%

Value, €/FPS

€2.06/FPS

89%

Price, €

€212

100%

AMD Radeon Pro Wx 2100 Scheda grafica 2 GB GDDR 5

Buy for 212 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

118

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.84/FPS

100%

Price, €

€216.99

97%

FPS and Value Winner

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 D6 WINDFORCE OC 4G

Buy for 216.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

Trending Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo
Radeon Pro WX 2100

Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo
Radeon Pro WX 2100

Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017


Pixel Fillrate

19.5 GPixel/s

37%

Texel Fillrate

39.01 GTexel/s

42%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo

Radeon Pro WX 2100

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

GeForce GTX 1650

Jun 4th, 2017Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon ProGenerationGeForce 16
$149MSRP$149
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
NonePower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2 GBMemory
4 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
64-bitBus128-bit
48 GB/sBandwidth
128.1 GB/s
925 MHzBase Clock Speed
1485 MHz
1219 MHzBoost Clock Speed
1665 MHz
1500 MHzMemory Clock Speed
2001 MHz

PCs Using Radeon Pro WX 2100 or GeForce GTX 1650

With selected game settings

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.