The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only €10.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 9% cheaper – €99.99 vs €109.99
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 35 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
96%
Min 1% FPS
18
90%
Price, €
€99.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, €
€109.99
90%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
95%
Buy on Amazon
€109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.98
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
97%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
97%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
97%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
