The Radeon PRO W7500 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €131.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 70 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 29% cheaper – €321.99 vs €452.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Radeon PRO W7500 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
66%
Min 1% FPS
45
60%
Price, €
€452.99
71%
Value, €/FPS
€5.39/FPS
47%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, €
€321.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.51/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€321.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€329.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€384.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€323.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€653.79
In Stock
Radeon PRO W7500 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
34%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
35%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
62%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon PRO W7500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $429.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
70 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 108.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 190.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 12.19 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
