Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 267 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 25 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 18% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GeForce MX450 25W - 119 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 4 vs 2 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
37%
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1725 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |