Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 2060 is 586 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 25 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Performs up to 39% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than GeForce MX450 25W - 100 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 6 vs 2 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€280.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €280.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
25%
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2019 |
GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Not Available | MSRP | $349 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1365 MHz |
930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1680 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |