Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GTX 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 4077 days newer than GeForce GTX 680M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 100 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 4100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 680M - 42 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M - 8 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
13%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
27%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |