Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 2898 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 180% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R9 Nano - 42 vs 15 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 130 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$599 | MSRP | $649 |
| 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 2440 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
