Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3480 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than GeForce 210 - 98 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 75% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €39.99 vs €157.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Rust than GeForce GTX 1650 - €0.48 vs €1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 31 vs 75 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
29%
Price, €
€157.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for €39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |