Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3480 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 44% better in Battlefield V than GeForce 210 - 111 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 72% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €45.99 vs €162.0
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 31 vs 75 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €162 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74047 minutes ago
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74047 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
3.903903903903904%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
4.461604461604462%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |