Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 2240 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 46% better in Starfield than Radeon R7 265 - 19 vs 13 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 50 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
