Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 2295 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 250E - 65 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 4 vs 1 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
