Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is 1132 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti - 30 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 83 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 175% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 11 vs 4 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
25%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
20%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
139.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 10th, 2017 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 10 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 11 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5X |
| 128-bit | Bus | 352-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1481 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1582 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1376 MHz |
