Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 380 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1763 days newer than Radeon R9 380.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R9 380 - 36 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 30 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
66%
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
86%
Texel Fillrate
108.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
