Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1252 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 7% better in Dota 2 than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 162 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 30 vs 50 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
93%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
| None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
