Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 1030 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 1030 is 2668 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GT 220 - 28 vs 24 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 30 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 2 vs 1 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
FPS
28
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
20.434227330779056%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
40.87425489639512%
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | May 17th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Not Available | MSRP | $79 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1228 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1468 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |