Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 240 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 240 is 1351 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GT 220 - 9 vs 7 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 30 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 2 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
85.71428571428572%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
97.22222222222221%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |