Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 1462 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 509 vs 492 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 35 vs 45 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
23%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
84%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
