Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 840 days newer than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 15 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 55% better in Monster Hunter: World than Iris Plus Graphics 640 - 73 vs 47 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €156.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
56%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |