Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 1563 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 56% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7500 - €216.99 vs €488.90
- Up to 49% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Radeon PRO W7500 - €1.71 vs €3.35 per FPS
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 15% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 1650 - 146 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 70 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
127
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.35/FPS
51%
Price, €
€488.9
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €488.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
49%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$149 | MSRP | $429 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |