Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 657 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 370 vs 366 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
69%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
