The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 50 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
62
41%
Min 1% FPS
30
33%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Average FPS
152
100%
Min 1% FPS
92
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4070 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
32%
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
2.458 TFLOPS
8%
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 12th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $5.99 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 38.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 158.4 GPixel/s |
| 76.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 455.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.458 TFLOPS | FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS |