Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce 920M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 2504 days newer than GeForce 920M.
Advantages of GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 33 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 30% better in Far Cry 6 than GeForce 920M - 86 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920M - 4 vs 2 GB
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce 920M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 920M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 954 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
