The GeForce 920M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 33 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920M vs GeForce RTX 4070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
40
26%
Min 1% FPS
15
16%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Average FPS
152
100%
Min 1% FPS
92
100%
Price, €
€644.28
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.23/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€644.28
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,225.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
GeForce 920M vs GeForce RTX 4070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920M vs GeForce RTX 4070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920M vs GeForce RTX 4070 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
732.7 GFLOPS
3%
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 12th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.632 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 158.4 GPixel/s |
| 30.53 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 455.4 GTexel/s |
| 732.7 GFLOPS | FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS |
