Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3480 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Up to 79% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €45.99 vs €216.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 - €1.35 vs €4.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 31 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 53% better in Elden Ring than GeForce 210 - 52 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1418 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
52
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
32%
Price, €
€216.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1417 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 210 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |