The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €168.35 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 79% cheaper – €45.99 vs €214.34
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 31 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€52.34
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€214.34
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€229.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€347.56
In Stock
GeForce 210 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
