Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Arc A350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1072 days older than Arc A350M.
Advantages of Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 25 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 10% better in Resident Evil Village than Arc A350M - 91 vs 83 FPS
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€257
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €257 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 440 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Mar 30th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
88%
Arc A350M | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1150 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |