Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Arc A350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 196 days newer than Arc A350M.
Advantages of Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 25 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 105% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Arc A350M - 125 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A350M - 8 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 439 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 30th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Arc A350M | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1150 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |