The Arc A310 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only €78.88 more expensive!
Advantages of the Arc A310
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 30 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 63% cheaper – €45.99 vs €124.87
Arc A310 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
€124.87
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€153.76
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€154.72
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€52.34
In Stock
Arc A310 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A310 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A310 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
1%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A310 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
56 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |