Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Radeon R9 M395X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 471 days newer than Radeon R9 M395X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 75 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 8 vs 3 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Radeon R9 M395X - 21 vs 17 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
FPS
21
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15961 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
75%
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |