Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 M395X outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 M395X is 761 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 99 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 M395X - 35 vs 75 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
42%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Crystal System | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |